Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……
Balls to the Wall: I have a Dream to a A Few Small Steps to Freedom
Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King were visionaries. Mandela’s “ Long Walk to Freedom” has inspired many to change their views and perspectives. Once demonised, he was despised, hunted, hated, abused and cursed, because he made decisions based on how he saw life from his perspective . He stood his ground, was firm, assertive and courageous but, he also developed the ability to see things from a different perspective . Thankfully, he is now lionised, and respected, and in my humble view, Madiba is the pride of every single South African .
Squash Referees also walk a long road to freedom. They too, are sometimes despised, abused and cursed because of decisions they make from their high chair , and their view of events, which is very different from the players, and the majority of spectators. Referees make decisions based on their knowledge of the rules and with the hope of facilitating a fair game. Sadly, their decisions are probably guaranteed to displease most of the crowd, all of the time.
And as much as Mandela and King were visionaries, so Squash Referees are also expected to be, visionary. No other sport demands a knowledge of the rules, PLUS the ability to:
1) predict the future,
2) predict the players’ intentions
3) predict players’ relative speed and skills.
Because of this, refereeing Squash is arguably far more difficult than other sports where decisions are made on what has already happened, where the referee can “coach” the players and where they have assistance of linesmen, line judges, hawk-eye and the like
Those players and spectators, ( and this is probably true of all sports), have probably, never read the rules, attended a seminar or debated the rules within context of the Rulebook. And as effective as the propaganda/education of the apartheid system was, where many myths were propagated that eventually became part of many people’s belief systems, so a whole Rule Book of Myths relating to squash has evolved in the cold and echoing hallways and bars of Squash Court fiefdom. As the apartheid system blanketed people in a false sense of security, so these squash myths envelop squash players in a similar blanket of false knowledge. And this blanket eventually causes much crying, wailing and gnashing of teeth as perceptions and bodies clash.
Let me take your hand and walk you through a real-league experience to illustrate the ugliness of these clashes of perception. This match, ironically, and thankfully , was between 2 sides from the same club so many of the deep-heated scars could be iced, beered, bi-oiled and massaged back to friendship. Names and places have been changed to protect innocent people involved
“Then it was the war-horse, the Master against the Leader, the captain of the clan . And a merry time was had, as the Cee’s crept ahead with the 1st game to the Captain. Matters were leveled by the Master, but with a new Ref in control, all was tense as they tussled, teasing each other with cunning stunts of deception and lobbing floats. Then thunder dondered. Loud. Lightning flashed. The night turned black, as the Veteran, supposedly "TURNED", and the mood turned as a stroke was awarded. All hell broke loose. Between brutal persuasion and discussion, the Captain trying to turn the decision, was punished for dissension. At 1-2 down and 1-9 down , the Captain turned his brain back on, and the tussle was turned back on, but the Veteran, just tugged through. Off court, debates, diagnoses and discussion returned to turning and what-is-turning, and what is not-turning, but the world continued turning while the heated discussions kept on turning into the steaming showers and onto the beer-laden tables.
Then focus swung back to the courts, and it was down to the wire, as the Number 4’s unleashed their left handed swings and flailings on each other. Now, with that same veteran, sitting on his High Referee’s Horse, the combatants were far from comfortable as bodies bashed, balls flew, and curses collided as the normally peaceful , placid one, muttered, moaned, huffed and puffed as backswings and follow -through fights filled the Squash Courted Castle with tension. Eventually, the Aze sneaked in. But the air was icy on a night which is best, soon forgotten.”
So how do we prevent these skirmishes of ugliness ? Once that Competitiveness Edge boils over, it becomes as ugly and as unreasonable as the anger created by the apartheid system. Ideally, ( but someone will probably have to spend another 27 years in jail to change this), we need to change the Mind Set of South African Sports lovers - That Belief, that if their side lost, it is FIRST, the Ref that was to blame, and then, maybe, possibly, their side also played kak.
But Squash Referees also need to get it right, and the quickest march to this freedom from abuse, is to read and digest Rule 12 , the Interference Rule, and develop an understanding of The 4 Freedoms of the Squash Court
1. The Freedom to a FAIR VIEW of the ball … on rebound from the front wall
2. The Freedom to direct, and unobstructed access to the ball after completion of a reasonable follow through
3. The Freedom to a FAIR, and REASONABLE swing ( maybe this should read, Regular)
4. Freedom to play the ball directly to any part of the front wall
Finally, understand that the rules have not changed dramatically, and the Only rule that has changed, is the rule related to Turning . Space precludes discussion on all of the above, so let’s just talk about the Turning and Swinging that can turn lives, and squash league evenings, sour.
TURNING
In a rally, (and this applies to the return of service as well) , if a player strikes the ball directly towards the front wall and it hits his opponent , it is a stroke to the Striker of the Ball. If that ball is headed for the side wall, it is a let
However, if the player, allows the ball to pass around him and he turns around, either physically, or mentally, and plays the ball which strikes the opponent, it is a stroke to the opponent ( as consolation for that blue-yellow bone-sucking bruise he now boasts)
Physical Turning = literally turning around and following the ball as it moves behind and around you. (It’s easier to demonstrate than describe)
Mental Turning = allowing the ball to move behind and around you , without physically turning around.
Note: If a player changes his decision to play forehand, to a backhand, with the ball passing in front of him, it is NOT Turning
The Swingers Club – A Reasonable Swing
Reasonable – is an elastic word, influenced by perception, and players swings do differ, particularly amongst women. The best tip in terms of “defining” reasonable is to watch the Warm Up, and identify the 2 players , regular swing.
Other things to understand:
The player striking the ball has the right to play the ball at whatever stage he wants, even if it disadvantages him. His opponent must get out of the way.
The measure of how actively that opponent is attempting to clear the swing will influence the decision.
Minimal interference (where the shot is not really affected) does not automatically demand a stroke. A good guide is: Prevention of Swing = Stroke. Interference of Swing = Let
Too often, Referees’ focus is on the clash of bodies. What they should be looking at is the position of the ball, in relation to those clashing bodies
While Swinging Clubs, and swinging racquets and turners and Turncoats will forever cause dissension, with more understanding of these rules, the Long March to the Freedom of competitive, but friendly league evenings may become a reality.
I have a dream !!
**************************************
EP Squash Conundrum
If EP Squash can return 3 Gold medals, 4 Silvers and 8 Bronze medals from the Under-age Inter-Provincials, and have the following players ranked in the Top 10 in their age -groups:
Girls U/ 19: No 3 Lumé Landman, No 2 Elani Landman
Boys U/19: No 5 Jarryd Terblanche
Girls U/16: N 5 Ashleigh Schepers, No 1 Kacey-Leigh Dodd
Boys U16: No 8 Jethro Thornburn
Girls U/14: No 8 Hannah Knott-Craig, No 5 Aimee-Leigh Pote
Boys U/14: No 8 Dewald van Niekerk, No 2 Daine Kruger
And produce the 2 players ( Jarryd Terblanche and Elani Landman) rated as the Most Promising Male and Female at the Jarvis/Kaplan Inter Provincial,
Why did our senior Inter-Provincial sides produce arguably, our worst results ever at the 2011 tournament ?
*********************************************
And while our Provincial players battled, successfully and unsuccessfully, the core of EP Squash shivered during the break , with Derek Calitz de-faulting his way to victory at the Woolstaplers Tournament, Karen Schepers adding Gold to her cabinet at the EP Handicap Tournament and Neale Emslie, weaved his magic at the Walmer Classic.
Apologies: Carol Botha, the Cornerstone of Londt Park Squash was also awarded an Honours Award at the recent Squash SA Awards dinner, but was omitted from last month’s column
And the 2nd Half of the League Season, with all its twists, and turns, and swings, and see saws and sagas continue ……